Philadelphia Archives - Riddle Patent Law - Scranton, Philadelphia, Allentown

Trademark Application Filed for LOVE PARK

The City of Philadelphia applied to register LOVE Park as a trademark for tourism and recreational purposes soon after its major renovations. Click here for additional information.

What We Do:

Our trademark attorney prepares and files trademark applications for clients throughout the United States and abroad.
We prosecute and defend trademark infringement and unfair competition actions in the Federal Courts throughout the United States and abroad.
We also prosecute trademark office actions and appeals before the United States Trademark Office.
We draw on our experience as trademark litigators to guide you through the trademark process.
We support businesses, law firms, and individuals by providing specialized legal services in intellectual property matters.

Trademark Application Granted for DAB ARMY

This image displays the trademark application that has been granted for DAB ARMY

What We Do:

Our trademark attorney, having an office in Philadelphia, prepares and files trademark applications for clients throughout the United States and abroad.
We prosecute and defend trademark infringement and unfair competition actions in the Federal Courts throughout the United States and abroad.
We also prosecute trademark office actions and appeals before the United States Trademark Office.
We draw on our experience as trademark litigators to guide you through the trademark process.
We support businesses, law firms, and individuals by providing specialized legal services in intellectual property matters.

Attorney Charles L. Riddle Wins Legal Argument and Overcomes Motion to Dismiss Trademark Action

Counsel wins legal argument and overcomes Motion to Dismiss. Charles L. Riddle, attorney for plaintiff Jamie Flack, LLC, d/b/a “Rustique” filed a complaint for unfair competition and trademark infringement in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleged that a competitor adopted a confusingly similar name “Rustique Specialty Gifts” and used the name to promote similar goods and services. The defendant filed a motion to dismiss, and a successful legal argument in opposition was made by Attorney Riddle to have that motion denied. The federal court decided the motion in favor of plaintiff (opinion available here) and denied the motion to dismiss.

About the Firm

Attorney Riddle operates EsquireTrademarks.com, a service of Riddle Patent Law, LLC. The law practice focuses on the prosecution and defense of trademark infringement, unfair competition, and intellectual property matters. Attorney Riddle has multiple office locations in Greater Philadelphia, as well as Scranton, Allentown, and Harrisburg. Because trademark law is federal, Attorney Riddle serves clients throughout the United States and abroad in varying federal district courts. Charles L. Riddle, Esq. focuses on various patent, trademark, and copyright application matters – as well as litigation in the federal courts.

For more information on Esquire Trademarks, visit: https://www.esquiretrademarks.com

For more information on Riddle Patent Law, visit: http://www.riddlepatentlaw.com

Contact Attorney Charles L. Riddle:

Charles@charlesriddle.com

484.300.6325

Toddler Files Complaint for Trademark Declaratory Judgment Philadelphia Eastern District

Philadelphia Trademark Lawyer

176 Pirated Videos Successfully Removed from Youtube – Temporary Restraining Order Unnecessary

Riddle Patent Law / Esquiretrademarks.com succeeded in removing 176 pirated videos of a proprietary training course from Youtube. The course video was leaked by a student and posted on Youtube. Using the DMCA copyright takedown tool, the leaked proprietary training course was swiftly removed for an overseas client. Registered and unregistered trademark claims were also made in support of the takedown.

Concurrently, a temporary restraining order was prepared to petition the United States District Court for injunctive relief. A significant amount of time and expense was saved for the client through effective use of the available DMCA and trademark takedown tools. The average time to a TRO hearing is 8 days, while the takedown tools obtained the same result in less than 36 hours.

DMCA trademark Patent Copyright infringing video piracy